who is the happiest

 

Neolog

 Neolog Judaism is a moderate, modernist branch of Judaism that emerged in 19th-century Hungary. It balanced traditional religious laws with social integration and secular education. The movement resembled Western Conservative Judaism by keeping core Hebrew prayers and rituals, while updating synagogue aesthetics and promoting Hungarian patriotism. [1, 2, 3]

History and Origins

• 19th Century: Started during the modernization of Hungary as urban Jews sought cultural integration.
• 1868 Schism: Divided from Orthodox factions during the Hungarian Jewish Congress.
• Mainstream Status: Became the largest and most influential movement among urban, middle-class Hungarian Jews. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Core Beliefs and Practices

• Tradition and Change: Kept dietary laws (kashrut) and Sabbath rules, unlike radical German Reform groups.
• Modern Worship: Used organs, choirs, and sermons spoken in the national language inside grand synagogues.
• Academic Focus: Encouraged higher secular education and founded the Rabbinical Seminary of Budapest. [1, 2]

• 

Neolog Judaism is a distinct middle-path movement that bridges the gap between traditional Jewish law and modern European culture. While it shares the "halakhic moderate" space with American Conservative Judaism, it developed independently in 19th-century Central Europe and has a different relationship with reform.

The table below compares how Neolog Judaism stacks up against the Conservative and Reform movements across key religious and cultural areas:

Feature	Neolog Judaism	Conservative Judaism	Reform Judaism
Origin	19th-century Hungary	19th-century Germany / 20th-century US	19th-century Germany
Jewish Law (Halakha)	Binding but adaptable in practice; favors preserving traditional codes.	Binding but evolving through formal rabbinic committees.	Non-binding; viewed as a personal ethical guide.
Liturgy & Prayer	Traditional Hebrew text; adds choirs, organs, and local-language sermons.	Mostly traditional Hebrew text; introduces gender-egalitarian language.	Highly modified; heavy use of local language and shorter prayers.
Gender Roles	Traditional; maintains separate seating (mechitzah) and male-only ordination.	Egalitarian; mixed seating, ordains women, counts women in minyan.	Egalitarian; fully egalitarian seating, ordination, and rituals.
Cultural Identity	Strong emphasis on local patriotism (Hungarian identity).	Focus on pluralism and integration into Western secular society.	High focus on universalism and social justice (Tikkun Olam).

Key Differences Defined

• The Gender Divide: The most visible difference between Neolog and American Conservative Judaism today is egalitarianism. Neolog synagogues generally maintain separate seating for men and women and do not ordain female rabbis. Conservative Judaism shifted to full egalitarianism in the late 20th century.
• Attitude Toward Change: Reform Judaism intentionally broke away from traditional Jewish law to modernize the faith. Neolog Judaism, by contrast, sought to modernize the aesthetic of worship (using architecture, organs, and formal dress) while keeping the core substance of the laws intact.
• Geographic Isolation: Unlike Reform and Conservative Judaism, which spread globally and flourished in North America, Neolog Judaism remained structurally and culturally confined to the lands of the former Austro-Hungarian Empire.

If you want to dive deeper, let me know if I should look up:

• The history of the Dohány Street Synagogue (the ultimate example of Neolog style)
• The impact of the Holocaust and Communism on Neolog communities
• A practice multiple-choice quiz to test your knowledge on Jewish denominations

"The user is asking about the etymology of "Neolog" in Judaism. I found the answer in the search results.

Etymology of "Neolog":

The term comes from Hungarian "neológ," a 19th-century coinage from Ancient Greek:

• νεός (neós) = "new"
• λόγος (lógos) = "word; teaching, doctrine"

Literal meaning: "New teaching" or "new doctrine"

Context:
Neolog Judaism was a moderate reform movement that emerged in Hungary in the mid-19th century (following the Hungarian Jewish Congress of 1868). The name reflected its modernizing approach—adopting Hungarian language, integrating into society, and moderate religious reforms compared to strict Orthodoxy.

The movement was comparable to Conservative Judaism in the U.S. or Positive-Historical Judaism in Germany. The term distinguished it from the "Orthodox" (traditional) and "Status Quo" (middle) factions in Hungarian Jewry.

Nyers

 

propaganda

Hitler laid out two rules for effective propaganda. First, “it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.” Second, the bigger the lie, the more persuasive it is, for, in the simple minds of the masses, even as they themselves lie “in little things,” no one would be so brazen as to concoct an outrageous lie.

Thus, we have study is everything, repeated endlessly, and so sweeping. You must have a rav and women are better than men work the same way.  

leadership and more lies

 home page, first thing you see at Machon Shlomo site

is that what happens to BTs we become the leaders? this ad is a sham. at ms in particular you learn to obey

more

here's their cafeteria

here's the kitchen where the chef prepares sumptuous meals

the "gym" is a few weight bars in a machsan next door. 

as for all those photos of togetherness, Machon Shlomo was at least back in the day a cold, competitive place

Only in the South

 

chutzpah

https://youtu.be/OuYY1gV8jhU

6:09

This is the chutzpah of a fry Jew to talk about Beethoven like this and the innocent gentile listens attentively. 

More. another fry Jew talks disrespectfully to a legendary film critic.

Roger Ebert gave a negative review of Mel Brooks's "Dracula: Dead and Loving It" (1995). One day, when Mel Brooks ran into Ebert, he said, "Listen, you, I made 21 movies. I’m very talented. I’ll live in history. I have a body of work. You only have a body.” Roger Ebert was saddened by the encounter as he was a big supporter of Mel Brooks' works from his debut. Ebert later wrote, "I was surprised he didn’t realize himself that 'Dracula: Dead and Loving It' (1995) just didn’t work. Yes, Brooks has put together a body of work and yes, a lot of it has made me laugh, but I would not be doing him a favor if I did not tell the truth."

In fact, Ebert has been very generous with Brooks who has made a few good films (Producers, Young Frankestein) and many terrible ones.