Wednesday, August 31, 2022

Gemara, guilt, and gelt

I have just described the concerns of the Manalim. This is not the true Litvack. He was concerned with Hashem, all of the Torah, mitzvos, middos, chesed. But the Manal is the three G's. And by Gemara we don't mean all of the Gemara and certainly not the Yerushalmi. We mean small parts upon which lomdus or complicated abstractions are applied. We don't mean halacha, aggadata, Mishnah. We just mean thumb waving. To them, this is the entire religion. And you need money for that, so gelt is #2. And guilt is to push the Gemara and Gelt. 

So what do you do with your life? Gemara lomdus. Where do you do it? In or near a yeshiva. If you are not up to that, you obtain lots of money and give it to yeshivas. That's it. That's your life. They don't know about talents, dreams, love, friendship, or even mitzvos. Gemara, gelt, and guilt and all that points to gadolim. The 4th G.

Does this describe everyone in the yeshiva world? No. Rabbi Frand is not like that. Rabbi Miller is not like that. Rav Yaakov Weinberg was not like that. There are plenty that are not like that. But there are plenty that can be characterized this way. 

Tuesday, August 30, 2022

When to get married

Some say, the BT isn't ready. Wait a few years. I say, it's the opposite. In a few years, you won't be yourself. You'll be all hyped up with frumisms. You'll be artificial and lost. You'll have been conditioned to believe that love doesn't matter, that the goal is Torah. Find a spouse now when you still know what love is and still know who you are. 

Gemara, Gelt, Guilt, and Gadolim

Gemara lomdus: It's an inhuman outlook, that nothing matters in life other than Gemara lomdus. You hear it openly - "nothing else mattered," is a standard phrase. Often they try to use the Mishnah - "Talmud Torah c'neged culam," even though c'neged doesn't mean greater, it means 'next to,' 'adjacent to.' And Chazal say tzitzis and Shabbos and numerous other things are cneged culam. You hear that the world is nourishkite. It's all nonsense. They wipe out the whole world with one sweep of the arm. Anything you can mention they'll mock - Mozart, science, journalism, academia - all nonsense, all nothing. Even love they mock. You marry for good health and wealth so you can have lots of children that study Gemara lomdus. I heard a RY say that the yeshiva is the only place in the world with truth. Why would that be? All they study there is Gemara lomdus. At one yeshiva in NYC, a bachur started a Midrash Chaburah. Somebody in authority shut it down. They don't even study the halachos of the Gemara, which is the main purpose of it. Just the abstractions. Even mitzvos they mock. You hear, mitzvos are the floor, the minimum, mitzvos are easy to do, mitzvos are this thing you just gotta do - "you gotta do what you gotta do," I was told by one RY. All of this meets the cult criteria of us vs the world. we are the only ones with the truth, life control, knocking out individuality, wrapping oneself around simplistic ideology, thought stopping, corporate hierarchy, and isolation.

Gelt - you need lots of money to live as a Jew today. But contrary to the Gemara, they don't teach you a trade or let you learn one. They mock people who work. And those that go to work wind up paying 1/2 their salary in tuition  (in Chutz) to support those that don't. Isn't this what cults do, take your money, get you working all day for the cult? That's what I was doing, working a horrible job to get money for the cult. Every time I tried to switch to something more to my liking (as the Duties of the Heart says to do) they talked me out of it. Bachurim all over the place, even in the MO world, are racing around trying to figure out how to get rich.

Guilt - It's not over onas devarim or ruining people's lives or failure to do chesed. It's over bitul Torah and not giving enough money. And the price is burning hot hell or regrets even in Olam Haba. They terrorize you with that and they never let up. They achieve massive control via fear, like any dictatorship does. But many of the leaders have no such fear. Tell them they did something wrong and see if they care. This meets the cult criteria of phobia inducement and fear. 

Gadolim - You surrender your mind to guys who are good at Gemara lomdus. What if they contradict scholars of prior generations (like the Vilna Gaon)? Oh you must listen to the ones today. I'm guessing they said that in the Northern Kingdom too. Which ones? The ones that became famous. How did they become famous? Gemara lomdus. The RYs are the famous ones and you become a RY with Gemara lomdus. What about great lamdamin who don't go with their little pack? They get bounced and pounced. Rabbi Soloveitchik, Rav Herzog, Rav Kook, the Lub. Rebbe. There are plenty of others too. They are assaulted by pit bulls. I had a 'rav' who mocked those guys all day long. Ah but Rav Shach, that's who he liked. The one who stood up in a tennis stadium and spoke open lashon hara against klal Yisroel.

With the 4 G's they take total control of your life. They squash  your personality as badly as is done in any cult. The god is the right brain. They are no different from the scientist worshipers. They manipulate the Torah for their ends. It's really diabolical. 


Sunday, August 28, 2022

The Jewish Observer obituary for Rav Soloveitchik

I haven't looked at it for a number of years. Boy, when you look at it again, it hits you in the face like a brick. As much as anything else, the sheer dishonesty is alarming. They portray him as a Jewish studies professor. The man was a giant in that thing which the people of the Jewish Observer admired most -- or shall we say the only thing they admired -- Gemara lomdus. The article makes it seem that the most important thing in the Rav's life was secular philosophy, when in reality that was minor. A college professor once asked a student of the Rav if he often spoke out the ideas of Lonely Man of Faith in his class. No, said the student, it was a Gemara class. He didn't mention philosophy there. In other words, he put that book together on the side. It was a minor thing. Not that LMOF is a book of secular philosophy. It's religious philosophy. It's Torah. When did the Rav discuss secular philosophy? Hardly ever. In fact, given how religious a man he was, I'd say he never discussed secular philosophy. Everything was religion to him. But he mentioned gentile philosophers in Halachic Mind. That's nice. The Chovos HaLevavos also references gentile philosophers. He says so in his introduction. 

If you are going to question the Rav -- let's say you didn't care for his derech -- admit who you are dealing with, a Torah giant of the first order. But don't rewrite history, don't lie. The article is full of lies and deception and framing. It's disgusting. It's written by a person who obviously knew nothing about Rabbi Soloveitchik. Yeshiva guys often have this problem. They talk as if they were experts on whatever they are talking about, even if they know nothing about the subject. The Yeshiva world is rife with lashon hara about Rav Soloveitchik. They pass around myths from one guy to the next. 

The entire purpose of the JO article on the Rav was to insult him, was to minimize and marginalize him. That's why it was written. There was no concept that maybe he had a different perspective. It is the old my way or the high way. 


Thursday, August 25, 2022

Bait and switch.

 You fear being repressed and they tell you don't worry the mitzvos encompass all your life and bring out the best. But then you sign up and the mitzvos go out the window and all that is left is Gemara lomdus and obeying the rav. Bait and switch.

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

the craziest of all

It's not easy to be normal, not for anyone, and in particular not for Jews. So watch out for the guys who think they have it all figured out. I have known a few of these. They'll tell you how to be normal. Just follow them, they say.

Usually, they are the last ones you want to follow. They are the craziest of all. They oversimplify everything, but only according to their predilections. That doesn't help you. 

Sunday, August 21, 2022

talents and abilities

“If you have a unique place in society, you must know that it is not just a private opportunity, and you cannot simply do what you desire with it. You are there because of talents and abilities that God gifted you. And God doesn’t give or do anything in vain. You must utilize them for good.” Lubavitcher Rebbe 

One cult for another

Careful now. People cult hop. They get out of one cult and go to another that frees them from the first. Also people who warn you away from one cult send you to another.

Example. Aaron Rakefett warns you against the yeshiva world's attitude of 'my way or the highway,' but weaves fantasies of Zionism and the wondrous life in Medinas Israel. Likewise, Dovid Berger warns you against Chabad (his claims are mostly false in my opinion) but also pushes you in Zionism. 

The yeshiva world attacks Chassidus and Chabad but delivers a cult that is far worse than anything you find in either of them.

Chabad warns you against the misnagdim but delivers its own lunacy. (Talking about cultural Chabad not the philosophy.)

The entire frum world warns you about the world's cults but delivers its own.

In the end, you have to protect yourself. You don't do that by being naive, by buying bridges, by trusting people. Don't trust people without their earning your trust. Don't trust them because somebody else trusts them. Are you trusting the 'gadol' or trust your neighbor? You never met the gadol. You never read anything he wrote. What are you trusting? Hype?

Think for yourself. Judaism is not a cult, but the Jewish world has many cults.

Friday, August 19, 2022

It's like this

 "It’s important that everyone knows I’m so much more than the bad things that happen to me... You can’t wait until life isn’t hard anymore before you decide to be happy."  Nightbirde

Wednesday, August 17, 2022

he worked with this young man at his level

 A story is told in the biography of Rav Avigdor Miller of a disheveled young man who wandered into one of Rav Miller’s shiurim. He appeared to be homeless. However, he started attending shiurim. Rav Miller bought him a new set of clothes, but incredibly they were clothes in the same style of what he liked to wear, namely blue jeans and t-shirts. Same style just clean. Even more amazing, when the young man would pull out a portable television set with an ear-piece and watch it between shiurim, Rav Miller instructed his gabbaim to let him be. For those who don’t know, Rav Miller was one of the most vocal critics of television. He told his mispallalim to toss their TVs out of their windows and many did exactly that. Yet, he worked with this young man at his level. When the youth eventually left, Rav Miller lamented that he probably didn’t do enough to help him.  And Rav Miller is known for his uncompromising overall hashkafa and frequently blunt manner of expression. Yet, he knew when to employ it and when not to.

Monday, August 15, 2022

natural abilities

The Lubavitcher Rebbe said, “If God has blessed you with abilities – and He created nothing in vain – so if He gave you such abilities, you must utilize all of them in fulfilling your Divine mission. And you must do so in a way that no talent is left untapped.” He wasn’t talking only about Gemara skills. He guided people to be researchers, doctors, journalists, artists, teachers. He said, “God guides the steps of each person. If God put you in a specific place – literally and also in terms of your position and influence, it is God guiding you. He put you there for a reason.”

Is the yeshiva world a cult?

Frum people tend to believe naively that the Orthodox Jewish world doesn’t have cults. That’s a goyish thing. There are Christian cults, Buddhist cults. We get people out of cults and bring them home to Judaism. Right? 

Yet, we all know that many of those cults are run by Jews, so why can’t there be cults in the OJ world? We see that Jews are fully capable of it. Consider Sol Newton (born Sol Cohen) of the Sullivanians, Andrew Cohen of the EnlightenNext cult, Werner Erhard (born John Paul Rosenberg) of EST or Moishe Rosen of Jews for J. These are Jewish cult leaders. Jewish psychotherapist Eugene Landy had musician Brian Wilson in a one-person cult.

What was the Sullivanian cult? Here are excerpts from the article "The Sullivan Institute Was A Psychotherapy Cult Based In New York's West Side That Demonized Nuclear Families" by Jodi Smith.

The Sullivan Institute may not be as notorious as other cults in America, but that doesn't mean its intent or practices were any less sinister. The group emerged in the 1950s with an agenda to demonize the nuclear family, specifically women's roles as mothers. Much like the Grail Movement in Germany blended elements of Christianity with the New Age movement, the Institute's founder, Saul Newton, took pieces of psychotherapy, teachings from Marxism and Communism, and his idea of polygamy to form a uniquely cultish ideology. 

 Saul Newton's then-wife, Helen Fogarty, led the Institute at the side of her husband, working as a therapist to its members. During these sessions, Fogarty sometimes instructed members to have intercourse with Newton. If a woman expressed her desire to have a child with Fogarty, she made sure the future mother accepted the cult's mandate of including multiple potential fathers in the conception process. 

A piece in New York magazine further outlined the strictly enforced intimacy regulations. Ex-members shared stories of being forced to share their beds with new partners on a nightly basis. Married couples were not permitted to live together. Former member Paul Sprecher recalled Newton engaging in relations with a woman for whom he cared deeply, simply out of spite. 

... Some of the cult members received instructions as to which jobs they should take in order to make money for the Institute. The leaders levied fines against members who did things like show too much interest in their own children ($10,000). Other times, members received orders disguised as requests to provide hundreds of thousands of dollars to the cult to assist in their "personal growth."

Although members cut off communication with family members outside of the cult, they did receive encouragement to beg for money from them to line the Institute's pockets. Moreover, members worked multiple jobs to assist the growth of the cult and pay for required babysitters and boarding school for children.  

You get the point. That's some crazy situation. Cults do that. They normalize craziness. That's part of the appeal, the perversity of the ruling philosophies. When you encounter it, you feel as though you must be landing on some exciting truth. An example of that is the notion that Torah study, by which they mean lomdus on a few select sections of the Gemara, is the only worthy activity in life. Everything else is 'nourishkite.' More on that later. 

There's an appeal to the ego in all of this. You feel like a genius, or that you have been let in on genius, for summing up life in one sentence. 

Jews are uniquely able to concoct such philosophies. Why is that? It's because we are built to envision a dream that is not obvious. To live your life for an invisible Being, who never speaks to you, and to work towards a promised world that exists in another time and dimension. That takes imagination. We are built with that. Sadly, many of us misapply that ability to create fantasy lives. Some do it totally outside Torah constructs. Some do it within.

Yes, Jews are quite adept at running cults. And Jews who call themselves Orthodox are capable of some terrible behavior. One of the hit men for the mob group Murder, Incorporated was allegedly shomer Shabbos, albeit superficially. Murder Incorporated, which was active between 1929 to 1941, did much of the killing for the Italian Mafia and is responsible for 400 to 1000 contract murders. This Jewish gangster reportedly said, “I ain’t never wacked nobody on Shabbos.” There have been Orthodox Jewish crooks, child molesters, and cult leaders. Of course, they are not true Orthodox Jews, but they wear the garb, do the conspicuous mitzvos, and talk the talk. And there are people born to Jewish mothers who orchestrated the Ukrainian famine and ran the Soviet Gulags and Soviet secret police, killing millions. Jews, like any humans, are capable of some horrific actions. And so it goes that there are cults in the Orthodox Jewish world.

So is the yeshiva world a cult? Like with any disease, you look at the symptoms. Here's the basic list:

Deceptive recruiting

Isolation

Personality Breakdown/Life Control

Programming/brainwashing

Along with all that comes elitism, us vs them mentality, grandiose schemes, banning of questions, idolization of self-appointed leaders, radical life changes, celibacy and sexual manipulation, thought confusion, thought stopping, and financial exploitation.

Even though deceptive recruiting comes first, I'll discuss it last since we first must discuss what the yeshiva world is like before we can consider if we have been recruited deceptively.

Isolation:

I was considering moving to Cleveland. I had a friend there, a yeshiva guy, who along with his wife conveyed to me his attitude that the only option was to live in Cleveland Heights with the yeshiva crowd. Beachwood and Univ. Heights were not options. Why would you live with those people, you know non-hard-care yeshivish people? That was his attitude. I have encountered this attitude about many places including Monsey and Manhattan. 

Similarly, a yeshivish Mesivta Rebbe I knew in a NJ town once commented to me critically that I wasn’t in the yeshiva world. I don't know what he was basing this on as out of respect I kept the conversation pretty yeshivish when I was at his house and he otherwise knew nothing about me (as he never asked.)  I guess it was that I didn't daven at the local yeshivish shul, although I had tried but found the rabbi so obnoxious that I couldn't take it. His view: true Jews are yeshivish. 

Another guy, a RY at RIETS, criticized my checkered blazer (it had dark brown tones) because of what people would think of me. I should add that this guy, like many at RIETS, was raised yeshivish in Brooklyn. Yet, of course, he's a Zionist, so he's yeshivish when he wants to be and Modern when he wants to be. Likewise, I have been talked out of moves to Manhattan, San Francisco, and Los Angeles because they were deemed traife environments as if New York is kosher. Meanwhile. Simcha Wasserman and the Rivnitzer Rebbe! have lived in LA and the UWS of Manhattan has a yeshivish kollel. I'm a BT who grew up eating cheeseburgers. If I'm keeping mitzvos, it's not tragedy if I live in one of those places. 

What do all these guys have in common? Answer, they deem the yeshiva world to have the true Judaism. Sure, other groups are observant but are far inferior. This includes the Chassidim. Oh yeah, some of their observance is even superior. But who cares about that? Their learning is inferior (or so it's claimed), and that’s everything. I’m not agreeing with this attitude, just describing it.

You hear this so often. In many BT schools you’ll even get dissuaded openly from being involved in the Chassidic world.  I can give you dozens of examples from people I know well, including me. 

And certainly, the rest of the world is verboten. It’s all narishkite right? That’s the phrase they use again and again. The yeshiva world isolates you from academia and secular literature and certainly television and movies. I remember one shadchan in Paris going crazy on me because I said that I occasionally went to movies. I tried to explain that they weren’t Hollywood films but films of quality about human existence. That explanation didn’t help.  That most of the women I dated went to movies - including the one she set me up with - didn't change her stance. Her position on Paris: "It is the filthiest city in the world." She said it with venom. I saw Paris as a pretty classy place. Historically, it did introduce lots of immodesty to Europe but at this point, it's no worse than any other place. Quite frankly, a 5 minute conversation with this angry woman, daughter of a talmid chocham, was more harmful to my soul than most movies. 

They won’t even hear of a friendship with a gentile, even if you are a BT, even a childhood friend. I had a coworker who was kind of a friend. We were friendly at work and got together occasionally. If I described him as a friend to any yeshiva person they made faces. He was very respectful of religion, even encouraging. He was also very helpful to me in my career, giving me lots of free training. Not matter, he's a goy. \

The hatred of gentiles is automatic. I shared an idea with a local rabbi recently. I mentioned Rav Avigdor Millers reading of the Mishnah "There is nothing better for the body than silence." Why the body? You'd think it would say nothing better for human relations. It's the body because you can talk your way into a physical altercation or you can make yourself sick with self-talk. So I said, the Queen of England was famous for care with speech, that in 60 years of public life she never made an offensive comment that anyone can name. No matter what the situation, she kept her cool and her silence. And she lived until 96 in good health. Nice illustration, no? So what did he say to me, this rabbi? He said, "A goy?" He couldn't believe I was saying anything nice about a goy. I guess he doesn't study the Gemara which talks about learning from gentiles who do good.

Even to use a fancy vocabulary word disturbs them. "He persevered," I might say. "It was rather odious," I might say. Use words like that and you'll get that look that says, "What are you, a goy?" Have you ever noticed that many yeshiva people seem to try to sound unsophisticated, even boorish. Somehow, that makes you frummer. They isolate themselves from the English language.

Even within the yeshiva world you are isolated. This yeshiva doesn't approve of that one. They fight all the time. At the famed Ponovitch, they come to blows.

I heard a RY of a NY area yeshiva say at a dinner that the only truth in the world was in the yeshiva. He must have been talking about himself because I can't imagine he thought the bachurim had truth.

Even within the Torah they isolate you. I have a friend who told a yeshiva rabbi that he was reading Shar Yichud of Duties of the Heart. This 'rabbi' yanked the book from his hands and ripped out the chapter. Just ripped it out of the book because the rabbi deemed this student not ready for this. What's the chapter about? It's about God. No, we can't think about that. They skip over aggadatas. They study only a portion of the Gemara, at least in yeshiva.

And then there's their treatment of Rabbis Soloveitchik, Steinsoltz, Shlomo Carlebach, Zevin, Herzog, and even towards the Torah Im Derech Eretz of Rav Hirsch. One RY wrote a book in English that essentially is a screed against the parts of the frum world he doesn't like.

I can give a 100 more examples. And you can give examples too.

Now the rationale for this is that the world is soaked in craziness today. And I don't dispute that. The world is a madhouse. But the world also has cures for some of its madness and there's lots of madness in the frum world too. So perfect isolation isn't necessarily the answer. And the yeshiva world - at least in America - is open to some of the cures, does allow a certain kind of psychotherapy but only from frum therapists who generally barely qualify as therapists. As Rabbi Miller noted, there is a benefit to secular studies but the problem is that we generally take in the garbage too. I think that's true. My biggest gripe about isolation within the yeshiva world is the isolation from other segments of the Torah world and the Torah itself. Now, not everyone does this. Rabbi Miller certainly valued the Chassidim. And there are rabbis at YU who essentially are yeshivish who are open to different kinds of things. So it depends how you define yeshiva world. So I'll say it's the Charedi yeshivah world. 

Now many full blown cults tend to lock people in rooms or buildings and yeshiva people do go out into the world. However, other cults lock you in a building during the initial indoctrination and then let you out to earn money for them. The yeshiva world is like this. I spent more than half my income on yeshiva tuition, which was very inflated due to all the kollel people who didn't pay. I was working day and night to give money for Torah, as they say. Isn't that what any cult convinces you to do, give your money to its cause? 

Within the yeshiva world there are actually different perspectives and you can pursue them if you can get past the brain washing of whoever is handling you. But then again you are told to listen to your rav, obey your rav. So what does it matter if there are different perspectives. Your rav has his perspective. So I'd say that the verdict on isolation in the Charedi yeshiva world:  guilty in many quarters, with some notable exceptions.

Personality Breakdown/Control:

Total life control produces personality breakdown. So do insults by the truckload. I once told a rabbi that I had studied economics in college. He said to me, "Isn't that all nonsense?" 

First of all, it isn't all nonsense. And second of all, who would say such a thing to a person? Obviously, I had invested time in this. I saw this same guy 30 years later and the FIRST thing he said to me was that my stomach sure looked big. (Note, he always had a big stomach.) 30 years later and he picked up where he left off, with an insult.

I have been utterly amazed at the boorishness of many yeshiva guys. It's truly shocking. It's not all, but it's so common. 

But much worse is all the life control. I'm not talking about halacha. It's more a matter of artificial behavior, controlled speech, conversation that consists of cliches. The black pants and white shirt getup is a bit much. Chassidim do that but they wear long coats and have funky hair. When the yeshiva guys switched over to black and white it didn't come out very well as their hair is all neat and trim and their little suits are dull.

Interests are not allowed. Hobbies? Ah that's bitul Torah. And even the Torah they study is so limited. A chaburah in Midrash at a yeshiva in Brooklyn was shut down for "not being what we study." And it's all done in one way, this Brisker Derech thing, which is a legitimate approach to study. But should it be the only approach? Even most BT schools are based nearly entirely on Gemara lomdus. Every one that I went to was like that. 

Even parnassah isn't allowed. They want you to have 10 kids, but won't allow you to apprentice or get some kind of job skills. And the professions people do eventually embark on - out of necessity - are very limited.

Ever noticed how everyone on Shabbos seems to keep the same schedule? You know when the streets are empty and when they are full. You know what clothes they'll be wearing in the different neighborhoods. Everything is so predictable. Why? Because their lives are controlled. Have you looked at a yeshivish shiduch resume lately? Says nothing about the person, just what yeshivas their siblings are in. 

A former rabbi of mine told me that "anybody can marry anybody." That's a guy who has no grasp of human psychology. He lives for his dogmas, so everything gets burned under that. Personality doesn't matter when you have dogma. 

With BTs you have the added dimension of life change. You change your clothes, name, food, daily schedule, language, activities. Your mind can snap from this. The loneliness and sexual deprivation can also make a person snap. Many have married the wrong person to end the loneliness. But marrying the wrong person won't end your loneliness. It will increase it and make it permanent. 

Now hard core cults take this to a ridiculous extent with multi-hour breaking sessions, public humiliation, sleep deprivation, and dishing out confusing logic that is designed to confuse the mind. (Over-complicated shiurim can have this effect.)

The yeshiva world replaces much of that with all day long Gemara study that is not preceded by much in the way of learning how to do it successfully. The Gemara is used to break people with confusion, with a feeling of failure. 

Verdict on life control and personality breakdown: largely guilty, particularly when dealing with baalei teshuva.

Programming:

Cults steal your soul by conning you into exchanging your life and yourself for a synthetic ideology. As your thoughts, feelings, instincts, interests, resources, and basic dignity evaporate, you cling more tightly to the ideology and its expositors. This produces an artificial high that one confuses with spirituality. In actuality, it's the sensation of idol worship. You are getting dizzy via the abandonment of your soul. The simple certainties feel like truths, but truths come about through years of study, work, thinking, reflecting, and listening. You don't buy them at a takeout stand. The cult leaders tell you that by obeying them your ego will shrink but actually it expands radically as you cling to them and absorb their massive egos. 

Programming usually involves a few simple notions, such as we live for Torah. I just described the contemporary yeshivish outlook on life. They laugh at everything else. It's all narishkite. Nothing else matters. How many times have you heard that? Particularly for the men, interests are irrelevant. Even love is irrelevant. That's all illusion. That's your yetzer hara. This is the programming.

Fear and neurosis are a major part of this. Disease, tragedy - all punishments for not obeying this or that. 

And what does it produce? You leave your life behind. You lose a sense of feeling, of your own thoughts, your instincts, your values. Your personality is lost in the shuffle. I know people who married people they didn't even like because a rabbi ordered them to. Why would they listen? They are told over and over to obey their rav. They didn't even know who they were anymore. They were pursuing a vague goal: Torah. And that was re-enforced by lots of fear and phobias, specifically the fear of hell and sickness and poverty for not obeying. 

A person can do immoral things in this state of mind. As Rav Soloveitchik noted:

[Many religious people today]"...act like children and experience religion like children. This is why they accept all types of fanaticism and superstition. Sometimes they are even ready to do things that border on the immoral. They lack the experiential component of religion, and simply substitute obscurantism for it....After all, I come from the ghetto. Yet I have never seen so much naïve and uncritical commitment to people and to ideas as I see in America....All extremism, fanaticism and obscurantism come from a lack of security. A person who is secure cannot be an extremist." A Reader's Companion to Ish Ha-Halakhah: Introductory Section, David Shatz, Yeshiva University, Joseph B. Soloveitchik Institute in Wikipedia.org.

Once you leave your mind behind, you'll do whatever you are told. This is what happens in the military and police departments. You have no tools to make decisions about what's right or wrong. You gave your brain away.

Part of the programming of the frum world is to built one's life around getting schar. Most people don't have a clue what that is. It's a kind of currency, of money to most. It's not much different from trying to get rich. And people will do all kinds of things to get rich. Many in the kiruv world are just trying to get schar off of you, that is spiritual money. But of course money isn't spiritual. Schar most likely is companionship with God and you don't get that by being a pig. But that's what many people become for schar. And you can become a pig too if you drop your values. 

Now with Torah you do have some protection in that there are normal people around and you can get your hands on books from broadminded and wise people. You just have to watch out for the nutjobs and programmers. Verdict on programming:  largely guilty.

Deceptive recruiting:

With FFBs, it's not as much an issue because they are born into it. So, too, are children born into gentile cults. Steven Hassan has videos about that. Once you are in, they brainwash you to keep you there. So what are the deceptions of the frum world?

There are so many points of deception that I could write 50 pages about it. And maybe I'll limit this post to that and make a series of this topic. Otherwise we have a book length post.

1) That you are allowed to think. Like many BTs. I was concerned that independent thinking wasn't allowed in the frum world. You see everyone dressed the same. You hear a lot about rabbis. You hear phrases like 'he ruled' and 'Torah authority.' Even before you come in you hear that. Many baalei teshuvah express concerns that becoming frum means shutting off of their brains. Kiruv people inevitably respond to that concern with words like these from Rabbi Uziel Milevsky of Ohr Somayach:

Christianity demands from its followers blind faith. Logic and reason are viewed as extrinsic to religion, and doubts are undesirable reactions that are to be stifled and purged from the mind of the believer. The approach of Judaism, on the other hand, is one that encourages questions. Faith that is not based on reason is considered fragile and dubious. Blind faith is for fools; the Torah demands that people think, that they attain faith by means of the intellect. One is expected first to examine every aspect of one's belief in God through the lens of reason before taking the final a logical step that is called emnuah. (Rabbi Uziel Milevsky, “Perspectives on the Parsha – Noach.”) 

That’s the standard response, that we are not like those Christians. This eases the concern.

Yet, is this what happens in frum society? Is it what happens in yeshivas? What happens is more like this:

He taught his talmidim that most questions beginning with ‘Why?’ (unless they are in the form ‘Why does Rashi or Tosafos say this?’) are more likely than not to be products of the yetzer designed to deflect from a full Torah commitment. In question and answer sessions, he refused to answer as many questions as he was asked. First the questioner had to acknowledge what was really bothering him and how the information sought was relevant to his life.

That's from an article about a man who ran one of the BT schools. Doesn't sound like he was very open to questions. Doesn't sound like what Milevsky promised. How can you "examine every aspect of one's belief in God" if you can't ask why?

In the yeshiva world, they have 1,000 ways of shutting off your brain. Ever heard these phrases: How dare you? You think you know? What do you know? You're a nothing. You think you're Reb Moshe? How dare you question the Chazon Ish? Chutzpah! You think you know better? That's not for you. You are not ready for that? Have you finished Shas? Do you even know one mesechta? 

How about this one: we obey the gadolim -- whoever that is. All day long, obey the gadolim. Who are they? Hardly any BT schools take students to see them. They remain mysterious figures who you must obey. And who decides who is a gadol? Your neighbor does that. 

How about the relentless question, do you have a rav? And if you name some schmuck down the block, that's acceptable. They just want to see you being controlled by somebody. But is this Torah?

The Charedi world has a shita, my way or the highway. This to me goes against the very grain of what Torah is about. Open up any Gemara, the minute you begin ,מֵאֵימָתַי קוֹרִין אֶת שְׁמַע בָּעֲרָבִין    three different opinions, everything has machlochet.... open up a midrash, open up a bereshis rabbah, shemot rabbah, etc. halachic midrash, so many different opinions, and outside of halacha, ....but hashkafa, philosophy, we leave very wide, each one is different, each one sees things differently, times are different, the trumpet is different, that's chinuch. i never in 62 years of teaching try to force my own thinking upon a student. 

Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet (https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/969741/rabbi-dr-aaron-rakeffet-rothkoff/hesped-for-rabbi-adin-steinsaltz/  29:51 )

I agree with Rakeffet. The Torah does promote questions. But does the yeshiva world do it? For when you become frum, yeshiva people tell you that you have to be yeshivish. So they show the openness of the Torah as bait to get you into the yeshiva world which is not open, for the most part. This is deceptive recruiting. 

2) That you can continue with your interests just as before. I have heard this phrased as "whatever you do know, you'll be better at." Machon Yaakov has this in its promotional video. One of the kiruv organizations used to have a campaign on its website that consisted of photos of various very handsome and pretty vaguely Jewish looking people and underneath their names was the suffix ism. So you had Bradism, Susanism, Stephanism. The meaning was that this religion is crafted around you! It's not Judaism. It's Bradism for Brad. The suggestion is that you don't have to change at all.

All of these promises are false promises. Because as soon as the idea that Torah life is obligatory gets into your head all that goes out the window. You hear all day long how you must have a rav and obey this and that. I'm not saying Judaism is all conformity, but to portray it as You-ism or that you can keep doing whatever it is you do now is so deceptive. And these are yeshivish organizations saying this when they fully believe that all free time is supposed to go to learning Torah. 

The real Torah consists of Torah and mitzvos. When you first hear about the yoke of Torah, you are concerned. But you hear about all these mitzvos that enrich your life and engage all parts of you in "ways of pleasantness." That's what they tell you. But when you get there, they toss away the mitzvos. The yeshiva world doesn't care much about them. It cares about lomdus. That's where the schar is, right? And your life goes out the window at that point. You have been deceptively recruited.

3) You are promised wonderful communities. Are they really wonderful? They have their merits but most of them are so messed up, constantly at war with one another and within. Likewise the wonderful rabbinic leadership you are promised. You think, a rabbi running my life? You are told, but they are so wise. They know people. Tell me, does your rabbi know you? Does he know anything about you? Does he know anything about life other than cynical digs into it. The guys I have met have been pretty lame, not all of them all the time. But it's a far cry from the what is advertised.

Verdict on deceptive recruiting: largely guilty, particularly with BTs where they are completely guilty.

Verdict on the charedi yeshiva world being a cult: a person certainly can experience it that way.

But here are some alternatives:

Rabbi Soloveitchik and YU

Rav Hirsch and Torah Im Derech Eretz

Chabad

Breslov

Other Chassidic groups

Individuals within the yeshiva world that are better: Rav Frand for example.

True Litvish living, rather than militant neo-Litvishism. The Vilna Gaon was an example of the former. 

Sunday, August 14, 2022

Parnassah


Duties of the Heart says that your parnassah isn't dependent on a particular means. "One should not think that his livelihood depends on a particular means and that if these means fail, his livelihood will not come from a different means. Rather, trust in the Al-mighty, and know that all means are equal for Him." You will get what is decreed for you. You should choose for your parnassah a field that interests you. "One who finds his nature and personality attracted to a certain occupation, and his body is suited for it, that he will be able to bear its demands - he should pursue it, and make it his means of earning a livelihood." 

Thus, aiming for a high paying field is not proper if you will not enjoy that field. It will not bring you any more money. Often, those who live the contemporary Manalist mantra of the world standing on Gemara, Gelt, and Guilt can't imagine doing anything but studying Gemara lomdus. Then they can't imagine the purpose  -- for  those who "must work" as they say -- of doing anything but the most lucrative business because one needs money to support Torah and one word of Torah, blah, blah, blah. All the nuances of life are lost in this dogma. It is not the proper way to approach things. Going for the money against your nature is the same as seeing your occupation rather than Hashem as the source of the money. "If one's livelihood comes through one of the means he worked on, it is proper for him not to trust in this source, rejoice in it, intensify in it, and turn his heart to it, because this will weaken his trust in the Al-mighty."

Working in the wrong profession can destroy a person's mind. Likewise, abandoning your dreams can destroy your psyche. The Rambam said, "Seeing that the maintenance of the body in a healthy and sound condition is a God-chosen way, for, lo, it is impossible that one should understand or know aught of the divine knowledge concerning the Creator when he is sick, it is necessary for man to distance himself from things which destroy the body, and accustom himself in things which are healthful and life-imparting." (Hilchos Deos 4:1) If you destroy your mind,  you also will not be able to engage in spiritual pursuits.

All those who give eitzah, all those rabbis who tell people how to live, keep this in mind. Get to know the person who comes to you. What makes him tick? What is his nature? You don't have to divine it. Ask him and usually he'll you. If your practice is always to deliver the bad news, always to say no, always to say no you can't do it, you can't go there, if you deem your job to be Mr. Din, if like the old Marx Brothers song line "whatever it is I'm against it." know that you are going to ruin people. The result will not be more Torah study but less. 


Friday, August 12, 2022

not enough to be a genius

 “The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”

― Nikola Tesla


stay true

 I think you’ve got to stay true to yourself you know. Ultimately. You know. Through the graft and all that. Try not to let people down and be as reliable as you can. But you’ve gotta stay true to yourself. 

Noel Gallagher


Definition of graft chiefly British: WORK, LABOR

Thursday, August 11, 2022

If it's good for the goose

Some people reading this blog are already going to call me an apikoris, so what the heck, I'll continue on with it. What is up with this?

He was completely subservient to the Gedolei Hador and his great Rabbeim, following their instructions with the greatest loyalty. 

https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/general/2112502/baruch-dayan-haemes-r-yaakov-rajchenbach-zl-pillar-of-chicago-jewish-community.html

I understand that they are talking about his role in public affairs, but still it's kind of odd. Completely subservient? Wouldn't we do that only before God?

Obviously, I'm not commenting on the man, but rather the portrayal of him. 

Again and again we see, everything they accuse Chabad of doing, they do themselves.  

So let's say it's a good thing to be completely subservient to the Gedolei Hador, then it's OK for Chassidim as well, including Chabad. 

As the expression goes, if it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. 

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

I'll give you a better answer

For two years, I walked around town and asked rabbis, if Torah is everything, why do we daven so much?

Here's the silliest response: your question isn't why we daven so much, it's why you don't learn more Torah. You should learn 4 hours a day.

You'll note, he mocked my question, saying it wasn't a question, which is serious mockery, and then he made assumptions about how much I learn - negative of course - and then he made a requirement that for a New York baal habayis is ridiculous. He never said anything nice about davening, just more praise for Torah. I would grade the response as an F.

Here's another response: most of davening is Torah. Once again, turning everything into Torah. What's good about davening, is that it's Torah. I'll note, this response was given pleasantly. His manner wasn't the disappointing part. The disappointing part was the this man was supposed to be a massive talmid chocham, truly famous for this knowledge. In fact, he had been introduced to the audience with the instructions, you can ask him anything. This was a Charedi yeshivish type. A son-in-law of a very famous gadol. He has now passed on.

A third guy was dismissive. I approached him at a bris and they were about to start the brochos, and he had about 3 seconds for me. He said something about, it's all one, meaning Torah and davening are connected. That's fine, but really it needs a little elaboration because we are told Torah is everything, so how can they be one? (Same guy didn't have time for me at his Shabbos table either, so it wasn't a matter of the brochos starting. And besides he could have said, hold on one minute, and then talked to me after.) This is a Rosh Yeshiva at RIETS. You'd think he'd have some familiarity with questions like this. 

So here's what any of them might have said. Shlomo said, the sum of the matter is to fear Hashem and keep His commandments. (Koheles 12:13) Tefillah helps us acquire yiras Hashem and is a commandment. As for Torah being everything, obviously, it isn't. The Vilna Gaon said, the purpose of Torah is commandments. And the purpose of life is to fix one's middos. (Even Shelaimah,chapter one)

So how is it, that none of these people managed to quote either Koheles or Even Shelaimah? 

Here's another answer from the Iggeret HaKodesh, middle of Epistle 7 of the Tanya

At this point the Alter Rebbe resumes the thought begun earlier, where it was pointed out that Jacob referred to G‑d as “E‑l, G‑d of Israel,” for the soul of Jacob (otherwise known as Israel) was illumined with all the aspects of the Divine radiance, just as was the soul of Adam.

והנה שופריה דיעקב מעין שופריה דאדם הראשון

Now “The consummate beauty of Jacob resembles the consummate beauty of Adam,”1

שתיקן חטא אדם הראשון

for he rectified the sin of Adam.2

והיתה נשמתו גם כן כלולה מכל הנשמות שבישראל, מעולם עד עולם

His soul, too, comprised all the souls of Israel, “from world to world,” i.e., both those of the “Revealed World” as well as the “Concealed World.”

והיה מרכבה לתורה שלמעלה, שנקראת בשם אדם

Moreover, he was a vehicle for the Torah in its heavenly state, which is referred to as Adam,

This phrase reflects the wording of a verse which begins with the words,3 זאת התורה אדם...‏ — “This is the law: A man...” Interpreted on the level of derush, these words have been taken literally to mean: “This is the Torah — Adam.”

כמו שכתוב: ועל דמות הכסא דמות כמראה אדם וגו׳

as it is written,4 “And on the likeness of the throne there was a likeness as the appearance of Adam” [lit., “of a man”], and the latter term, as is explained in the Kabbalah,5 refers to the Torah.

וכמו שכתוב: וזאת לפנים בישראל גו׳

It is likewise written:6 “And this (זאת) was the custom in former time in Israel...,”

That, at least, is the plain meaning of the phrase quoted. On the interpretative level of derush, however, each of the three Hebrew words is here construed as follows: זאת (as taught in the Zohar) connotes “Torah”; לפנים — “within”; בישראל — “in Israel the Patriarch.” At this level, the quoted phrase thus means that “the Torah is [implanted] within, in Israel the Patriarch.”

אין זאת אלא תורה

and “זאת refers only to the Torah.”7

שהיתה כלולה ומלובשת בנשמת ישראל סבא, הכלולה מכל הנשמות

For the Torah was contained and vested within the soul of “Israel the Patriarch,” which compounded all the souls. (The quoted phrase refers both to Jacob in the mortal world and to his Supernal source, which is also known by this name.)

Now in addition, Jacob, or “Israel the Patriarch,” was a vessel capable of receiving the radiance of the Torah. Hence:

וזהו: ויקרא לו אל אלקי ישראל

This is the meaning [of the above-quoted phrase], “And he called Him E‑l, G‑d of Israel”:

אל: לשון המשכת הארה מאור אין סוף ברוך הוא מההעלם אל הגילוי

Since the Name E‑l denotes the Divine attribute of Chesed, which finds expression in G‑d’s desire to communicate His hidden light, [Jacob’s use of] the Name E‑l signifies [man’s] calling forth the radiation from the [infinite] Ein Sof-light, which is clothed in the Torah, from concealment to manifestation,

להאיר בבחינת גילוי בנשמתו

so that it should illumine manifestly in man’s soul.

וכמו שכתוב: אל הויה ויאר לנו

Thus, too, it is written:8E‑l is the L‑rd, and He has given us light,” indicating likewise that the Divine Name E‑l connotes illumination.

Thus, when we say that Jacob called G‑d “E‑l,” we imply that he called forth and drew down into his soul an all-encom-passing revelation of the [infinite] Ein Sof-light that comprises all the particular details of the Torah and its mitzvot.

ואחריו כל ישרי לב, העוסקים בתורה ובמצות, מאיר אור ה׳ אין סוף ברוך הוא בבחינת גילוי בנשמתם

and after [Jacob], the [infinite] Ein Sof-light shines openly into the souls of all the upright of heart who engage in the Torah and the mitzvot.

“The upright of heart”9 alludes to those individuals within whom the G‑dly illumination found in the intellect descends to the heart, where it inspires them with a love and an awe of G‑d. These spiritual emotions in turn add vitality to their study of Torah and their performance of the mitzvot.

The Divine radiation felt by these individuals is termed “our portion” (חלקנו, as in the quotation with which this epistle opened). This is the particular G‑dly illumination which permeates a Jew’s soul through his performance of each and every commandment, and which is a portion and part of the all-encompassing illumination comprising 613 “parts”.

וזמן גילוי זה ביתר שאת ויתר עז, ההארה במוחם ולבם

The most elevating and most powerful10 manifestation of this [Divine] radiance in their mind and heart

הוא בשעת התפלה, כמו שכתוב במקום אחר

occurs at the time of prayer, as is explained else-where.11

It is by means of the ladder of prayer that all of a man’s mitzvot ascend; this same ladder also serves as the conduit through which the resultant Divine radiance and revelation descend to this world.

FOOTNOTES

1.

Bava Metzia 84a, et al.

2.

Zohar III, 111b, et al.

3.

Bamidbar 19:14.

4.

Yechezkel 1:26.

5.

See Zohar I, 71b ff.

6.

Ruth 4:7.

7.

Zohar III, 81b.

8.

Tehillim 118:27.

9.

[In the Hebrew original, this phrase reads ישרי לב. On this the Rebbe comments:] “For the word ישראל comprises the words ישר אל.” [In this phrase, the first two letters of ישר are each vocalized with a kamatz. As explained in Likkutei Torah, Parshat Shlach, p. 40c, these two words imply that G‑d’s power finds direct expression in the souls of those described as ישרי לב.]

10.

Cf. Bereishit 49:3.

11.

Note of the Rebbe: “Cf. Epistle 24, below.”

So why don't they know about koheles, even shelaimah or the igeres of the Tanya? I think the answer is that they are practicing Manalism. They reduced the entire Torah to one mitzvah, learning, which happens to be the way all of these people obtain their parnassah and their cavod. And they reduce Torah to abstractions on a few pages of a few mesechtas. 

Ironically, the essence of that mitzvah is teaching others. Rabbi Yonasan Gefen has a lovely vort on that. He gives these away so I am going to post the entire thing here with contact info to order more from him.


PINCHAS - WHY HASHEM CHOSE YEHOSHUA   by Yehonasan Gefen

 

Towards the end of the Parsha, there is the account of Moshe Rabbeinu s request that Hashem appoint an able successor to lead the Jewish people into Eretz Yisrael. Hashem answered him that his faithful student, Yehoshua, is the appropriate choice.  Chazal elaborate on the dialogue that took place between Hashem and Moshe.  They tell us that Moshe asked that his own sons succeed him as leader, however Hashem refused this request, because your sons sat and were not osek beTorah , whereas, Yehoshua was the rightful successor because he would come early to, and leave late from, your beis medrash, and would arrange the benches and cover the tables[1].  There are two difficulties with this Medrash;  Firstly, if Moshes sons were not osek bTorah then how could Moshe Rabbeinu have had any expectation that they could lead the Jewish people[2]?  Secondly, it would seem that Hashem was comparing Moshes sons to Yehoshua in the same area of hanhago - that of being osek bTorah.  However, when Hashem praised Yehoshua he stressed the fact that he set up the Beis Medrash - this does not seem to have any relevance to being osek beTorah.  What exactly was the nature of  the comparison of Moshes sons to Yehoshua?

 

Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv Shlita explains that Moshes sons were talmidei chachamim and they were learned enough to lead the Jewish people - that is why Moshe believed that they were fitting candidates for succeeding him.  However, Hashem replied that this was not sufficient; when He said that they sat and were not osek bTorah’” He meant that they sat and learned for themselves and were not osek with others in Torah.  In contrast to their lack of being involved in helping other peoples Torah, Yehoshua would set up the Beis Medrash and thereby enable others to learn Torah - that is considered being osek bTorah[3].

 

There are a number of important lessons that can be derived from Rav Elyashivs explanation[4], however, there seems to be one specific difficulty with it - it would have seemed that being osek bTorah only implies learning Torah for oneself, where is the allusion to enabling others to learn Torah?  In order to answer this it is necessary to understand the basic definition to the mitzva of Talmud Torah.  The Rambam writes that there are two sources for the mitzva; You shall teach  them to your children and you shall teach them sharply to your children..  From these commands to teach children the Rambam derives that a person must learn Torah - the fundamental reason given for learning Torah is so that one can teach it to his children.  We see from here that the mitzva of Talmud Torah refers to teaching as much as to learning.  Moreover, the Rambam brings the Chazal that children also refers to students, and that a fundamental part of the mitzva is to teach people even if they are not ones own children[5].   Thus, it is quite understandable that Rav Elyashiv can translate, being osek bTorah as meaning causing others to learn Torah.

 

Another source for the concept that Torah intrinsically involves enabling others to learn Torah is found in the Gemara in Avoda Zara[6].  The Gemara says that world history is split into three periods of two thousand years:  The first is called the two thousand years of nothingness,  the second period is known as the two thousand years of Torah.  The commentaries explain that the years of nothingness are so called because of the lack of Torah in the world during that time, whereas the years of Torah mark the beginning of Torahs presence in the world.  The Gemara says that the years of Torah began with the time that Avraham began teaching Torah to the world, as represented by the souls that they made in Charan.  However, there is a difficulty with saying that the years of Torah began only at this point in time.   There are many maamarei Chazal which clearly state that there were great people who lived before Avraham and learned Torah,[7] and yet they lived in a time that is described as being absent of Torah, moreover Avraham Avinu himself learnt Torah long before he began teaching others - the era of Torah only began with the souls that they[8] made in Charan[9]. - why is this the case?  Rav Zev Leff Shlita explains that Avraham Avinu did something more than his illustrious predecessors - he taught Torah.  The era of Torah only begins when Torah is taught as well as learnt[10].  

 

The Maharsha makes a comment that develops this theme further by showing that, in addition to regular learning of Torah even the concept of Ameilus bTorah  is intrinsically bound up with teaching Torah.  The Gemara[11] derives the importance of ameilus bTorah from various passukim in Tanach that mention the word, lamal[12] (to toil).   The Maharsha writes that the letters of lamal (lamed, ayin, mem and lamed) make an acronym of lilmod al menas lelamed.[13]

 

We have seen many sources that show that learning and teaching Torah are in the same category.  It still needs to be explained why teaching Torah is so fundamental in Jewish thought.  The Ben Ish Chai ztl provides us with a deeper understanding of this inyan.  He brings the Gemara in Sanhedrin[14] that quotes the passuk in Shelach saying that person who serves other gods has degraded the word of Hashem[15].  The Gemara then describes other modes of behavior that deserve this devastating indictment[16].  Surprisingly, the Gemara adds that the passuk includes one who learns and does not teach.  The Ben Ish Chai asks why the Gemara speaks so harshly about one who learns but does not teach.  H ae explains that the Torah is eternal and its eternal nature is preserved by passing on its teachings to the next generation.  However, he writes that a person who learns but does not burden himself to teach his fellow damages the eternal nature of the Torah because the Torah that he learns cannot move on to the next generationtherefore it is understood why Chazal describe this man in such a severe manner - because he prevents the chain of the passing down of Torah from generation to generation and nullifies the Torahs eternal quality..[17] 

 

This also helps us understand why it was important that the leader of the Jewish people be one who causes others to learn Torah - his role was to preserve and continue the mesora and thereby preserve the eternal nature of the Torah.  We have seen how intrinsic teaching Torah is to the mitzva of learning Torah.  Moroever, whilst teaching Torah is a great chesed to other people, it is also clear that there is a very significant element of bein adam leutsmo in teaching Torah - it helps develop our appreciation of the eternal nature of Torah and to play a role in passing it on to the next generation.



[1]   Bamidbar Rabbah, 21:14.

[2]   This question is asked by Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv Shlita, Divrei Aggada, p.319.

[3]   Ibid.

[4]   See his continuation in Divrei Aggada, p.319-20 where he elaborates on the necessity to share one’s Torah with those who are distant from the true path.  We also learn from his explanation that the ability and willingness to share Torah with others is a key trait in determining an effective leader.

[5]   The Mishna in Avos, 1:1 tells us that we must “establish many students.”  The Tiferes Yisroel writes that it is not enough to merely teach one’s own children but one must teach other Jews as well.

[6]   Avoda Zara, 9a.

[7]   Chazal say that Adam HaRishon, Noach and Shem v’Ever learnt Torah.

[8]   ‘They’ refers to Avraham and Sarah.

[9]   Avraham was 52 years old when the era of Torah began - see Rashi, Avoda Zara, 9a.

[10]   One may ask that Avraham was not the first to teach Torah - Shem and Ever had yeshivas where they taught students.  See Rambam, Hilchos Avoda Zara, Ch.1 Halacha 3, with Raavad and Kesef Misha, Shut Chasam Sofer, hakdamo to Yoreh Deah, and Chomas Hadas of the Chofetz Chaim who all deal with this issue.

[11]   Sandedrin, 99b.

[12]   See Iyov, 5:7. Mishlei, Ch.16.

[13]   Maharsha, Sanhedrin, 99b.

[14]   Sanhedrin, 99a.

[15]   Shelach, 15:31.

[16]   Included in this list are one who is megaleh panim b’Torah and one who claims that the Torah is not from heaven.

[17]   Benyahu, Sanhedrin, 99a, quoted in ‘Peninei Ben Ish Chai, Shelach, p212.

To get weekly Torah insights from Rabbi Gefen write here: yehonasan@rabbigefen.com

So if they are doing such a poor job of teaching, are they even learning? I think what they are doing is a big pile of yeshus. It's all me-ism. Maybe not all, but it's drenched in that. 

And if they are learning such a small sliver of Torah, are they even learning? The Talmud (Kiddushin 30a) says, “To what extent is a person obligated to teach his son Torah? Rav Yehuda says that Shmuel says: (One should emulate the education of) for example, Zevulun ben Dan, whose father’s father taught him Bible, Mishna, Talmud, halakhot, and aggadot.”  The Vilna Gaon said “One must first fill himself with knowledge of Tanach, Mishna, Babylonian and Jerusalem Talmuds, Tosefta, Mechilta, Sifrem and all other baraisos. Then he should discuss and debate his learning with his colleagues. By studying in this sequence, one attains the splendor of Torah. One who changes this arrangement, however, and studies how to debate before knowing one Mishnah openly, will forfeit even the little Torah he heard in his youth.”  (Even Shelaimah 8:2) 

They aren't learning much, they aren't teaching, they aren't doing much chesed. What are they? It's nebach.