Compare and contrast

Here are two divrei Torah that I read yesterday, one from a neo-Litvish Rosh Yeshiva and one from a Chassidic Rebbe. Take a guess, which is which. 

1) Yosef Hatzadik was alone for nearly twenty two years with no chavrusa, no shiur, no Daf, no kehilla, no shul, yet he maintained his madreigah. This shows the koach of a Yid. 

2) This week’s Vort – פרשת שמות ותקרא שמו משה (שמות ב:ו) And she called him by the name Moshe. Moshe Rabbeinu had ten names; if so, why does the Torah refer to him by the name of Moshe? Especially if Basya, the daughter of Pharaoh, named him this name, why does Hashem refers to him by this name?

The Torah wants to teach us the value of an act of chessed - doing kindness to someone. Basya gave the name” משה - כי מן המים משיתהו”- because I pulled him out of the water - which was an act of חסד. 

The name משה רבינו and the word בגמילת חסדים are both equivalent to 613 – the amount of mitzvahs in the Torah.  This comes to prove that all mitzvahs revolve around chessed.

-------------------------------

So what do you say? Which is which?

Here's two more that I heard recently.

1)  Famous American 'gadol' to visitors (I believe they might have been children):

Do you await Moshiach?

Yes.

Do you want him to greet you?

Yes.

Then you must learn the laws of brochos because he won't greet you if you don't know them.

2) ואלה שמות בני  ישראל הבאים מצרימה (שמות א:א)

Why does it say these are the children of Yisrael (Yaakov Avinu) who are coming to Mitzrayim - הבאים is present tense – versus אשר באו - they came, which is past tense?

Because during the 210 years that the Jews were in Mitzrayim, they kept themselves estranged from the Egyptians, as if they had just arrived.  They didn’t change their attire, language, or names.  Therefore, it says ‘הבאים’, since they kept to their traditions each day anew, as if they had just arrived.

A chassid was struggling with parnassah (finances), and he asked Reb Yehoshua of Belz zt’’l for a blessing for good livelihood.  Reb Yehoshua advised him to travel to America, where he will be very successful, on the condition that he should send the Rebbe letters from time to time and share his financial and spiritual status.

The chassid followed the advice from the Rebbe, and at first sent letters depicting his struggles in America.  He was struggling both financially and spiritually –Shabbos, Kashrus, and Torah were a tremendous challenge.  The chassid concluded each letter asking the Rebbe, "Should I remain in America, or return home?"

With each letter, Reb Yehoshua replied with words of encouragement and told him to stay living in America.  After a while, the chassid finally saw success in business and he started becoming acquainted with his environment.  He made good friends and he was satisfied with life in America. When he shared the good news with Reb Yehoshua of Belz, the Rebbe replied, commanding him to leave America and his business and return back to Galicia.

The chassid listened to his Rebbe and returned home to Belz.  When he arrived, he asked Reb Yehoshua to explain, "Why when times were difficult you encouraged me to stay, and when I finally started being comfortable, you told me to return?"

Reb Yehoshua answered, “Yes, you're right! As long as you felt like a stranger, and the American culture didn’t pull you, I wasn’t worried about your spiritual state.  But as soon as you became successful, and you started acclimating to your surroundings, I was afraid you’ll assimilate in the ‘melting pot’ of (then) America.”

----------------------

So what do you say? Which is which? I'll tell you. The ones that are only about Torah study and knowledge are the neo-Litvish ones. The one which wonders how Yosef could survive in Egypt without the daf is neo-Litvish. The daf. The one where Moshiach is portrayed as a redeemer who could easily reject you is the neo-Litvish one. The one about Chesed is Chassidish. The one about a Rebbe caring about his chossid, encouraging the earning of parnassah, giving chizuk, not being terrified of going out into the world yet paying attention to general kiddushah is Chassidic. That one that references power is neo-Litvish. That one that references spirituality is Chassidic. 

You see where I'm going with this?